Agaw-Kemant of Ethiopia, Gondar Quests for Recognition
1. Coping with Challenges
The Kemant people are a sub-group of the Agaw people. Like other Agaw
groups, they experienced prejudice and stereotype for centuries. A
mechanism adopted by community members to adjust in the harsh social
environment was self-denial or bogus identity pronouncement. It was not
unusual for a Kemant woman not reveal her real identity even to her
husband. It was also normal not to talk the Kemant language not to
expose one’s actual self. The life of secrecy went on one generation to
another to deal with the situation. The mechanism had been in practice
for centuries. The cost is unimaginable; it has endangered their
existence as the community. In 1991, at the time of ethnic
self-determination was declared in Ethiopia, the presence of Kemant in
Ethiopia was little notable. There were several factors contributed this
to happen:
a) Their educated children’s interest in socialist ideology and strong affiliation with parties promoting socialist ideas.
b) Reluctance to come out publicly as the Kemant because of stigma attached to the Kemant community.
c) Linguistic and cultural weakness.
d) EPDF’s preoccupation with language aspects ignoring other characteristics that make up group identity, and
e) Other related social factors.
Their existence was disclosed in 1994 census statistics; 172,327
people registered as members of the Kemant ethnic group. Some observers
estimate this figure just 17% of actual Kemant population in Gondar.
Unfortunately, the Kemant’s independence was scrapped in 2006 population
census entirely and not counted as a distinct ethnic group, exceptions
of a little data obtained from individuals. According to close
observers, the situation created disappointment in the Kemant community,
including ANDM/EPRDF members. Then, both EPRDF members and non-members
moved together forming a committee to investigate the incident such as
who discarded it and why. However, after discussion at a meeting, they
decided not waste time in the inquiry of the incident rather agreed to
push ahead with quest for recognition based on the constitution and
historical facts. At this point, the recognition demand which has
started in 1994 seemingly revived and secured support virtually all
sectors of the society.
A council of 120 representatives was formed and
installed its headquarter in Gondar City to oversee the process.
Subsequent to consultation with rural community, the recognition request
was formally submitted to Mr. Ayalew Gobeze, Governor of Amhara Region.
He was reportedly positive on the issue and sought a time to consult
with his advisors, then consensus was reached to discuss the matter at
Regional State Council. The council’s then House Speaker failed to
present the agenda to the council and pushed the matter to the
Federation Council. As report submitted to the same, some standing
committee members in the federation wanted the issue to be appraised at
the regional level, before it brought to the federal level.
The back and
forth bureaucratic process created extra delay in resolution and
consequently created frustration in the community members, rural
population in particular. There was report that Kemant activists raised
the issue at the ANDM conference in Bahir Dar seeking reasons for delay.
Mr. Addisu Legese who was chairing the conference replied it was still
intact confirming his support for the principle of self-administration.
He further added, his sympathy for delay pointing the accountability to
the Regional body. The issue is expected to be addressed when the next
new government assumes responsibility as a result of 2010 election.
2.Public Support
While dealing with regional and federal authorities, the committees
every level and the council were consulting with public to secure
support on the issue. In this aspect, the result was unimaginably
successful. Let me give you two examples occurred in Aykel about 40 kms
away from Gondar City and Lay (upper) Armachiho, Tikledengay. In Aykel,
more than 4,000 participated a meeting in September just in an hour
announcement on microphone. In Lay Armachiho, rural woreda, about 8,000
people attended the meeting arranged by the committee. The next
consultative public meeting was expected in Metema Yohannes city. On
both occasions, chatting and screaming was observed to express their
joys and painful memories of the past.
In the meantime, many of them
were anxious to hear the status of the case. They asked frequently
questions to find out reason for delay. Some rural people tried to blame
the government for delay. On contrary, the committee members advised
the people to be patient by saying “the government is capable of
addressing the Kemant people’ plea fairly.” Public gathering was held
in other woredas, and reportedly there was overwhelming support for
quest for recognition and self-administration. The entire population who
has declared itself Kemant is about 1-million.
The population is
adjacently settled and biologically, psychologically and historically
Kemant, except majority of them lost their traditional language under
the centuries of repressive systems. Desired for self-administration
appears to regain what is lost in the past. Quarans want to revive an
Old Testament system, but majority Kemants like to maintain Christianity
while rehabilitating the culture and language, which in the process of
extinction. Language endangerment is also concerns of Awi whose speakers
are shrinking day-to-day and other Agaw groups. Chekole (2010) proposed
English the medium of instruction for primary schools in Awi Zone, to
revive Awi’s language using English as an intermediary.
The Kemant homeland surrounds Gondar City and then extends south-west
and west. In western, border area with Sudan are mixed with new
settlers, a considerable number of people are resettled in Metema and
Quara. Currently counties (woredas) characterized themselves Kemant are
Quara, Chilga, Lay Armachiho and Metema in full and the two third of
Gondar Zuriya, partially Gondar City, portions of Wogra and Dembya.
Feeling in Gondar City seems mixed regard to the Kemant community
demand; I heard two individuals saying, creating an additional third
administrative zone will weaken Gondar’s strength. However, an elderly
person told me that “whatever Gondaris are called Amharas or Agews or
Kemants, that doesn’t matter, as far as they share common goals to
develop and strengthen Gondar as the historical place.” He added, “if
God created us as Kemants we have to accept the Creator’s decision since
He is above all creations. “
However, there was some sort of misunderstanding by individuals in
Tach (lower) Armachiho Woreda following Wags, Awis, Kemants and
Lalibelans, a reunion conference in Seqota in August. As a result,
public prayer was held in Tach Armachiho for peace in Orthodox churches.
However, when they saw the phrase, “we love you” written on goats
donated by the Wag Agaws, the concerned was dropped and turned to fun.
The participants of the reunion conference were not only Agaws/Agews,
there were guests, like Oromo Zone Nationality House Speaker, Governor
Mr. Ayelew Gobeze with cabinet members, guest scholars, including
historian Professor Lapiso Dilebo, who reported to the audience the
presence of 23 million Agaws in Ethiopia today. News about the reunion
conference seems disseminated in rural areas in northern Ethiopia more
than coverage given by radio and television programs. Consequently, in
the beginning of September, Agaws from Semen Gondar Woredas sent a five
person delegate to Gondar City to make an inquiry for their exclusion
from the Sekota’s reunion conference. These Agaws are not part of the
present Kemant community freedom movement, but they just interested to
take part at the reunion conference.
3. Peaceful Resolution Possible
It is highly expected that the Kemant community’s recognition request
will be approved and Gondar will enjoy three-zone administrative
structure, which is unity with natural diversity, as civilized society
based on democratic principles and values. The outcome will guarantee
durable stability, peace and development in Gondar, as well as, in Amara
Region and at large in the country. This seems the interests of the
Ethiopian people, friends of Ethiopia and all civilized societies.
In contrary, there may be a remote option to react negatively under
influence of an old “wuqabe” (spirit) against democratic norms and human
dignity. In the past, the characteristics of the old wuqabe were
associated with stigmatization, demonetization, hatred and domination
against fellow citizens. Indeed, this was backward ideology, which kept
Ethiopia on poverty of island. At this point it will be a wrong choice
and; no force can stop the rural community population any more by any
coercion. If this path is chosen, Gondar can plunge into irresoluble
crisis. Any body familiar with social history and geographical landscape
Gondar, especially these areas knows certainly what that mean. Finally,
let us hope the government of Ethiopia, regional government and all
concern body in Gondar will ply a constructive role for the resolution
of the crisis in a democratic and civilized manner.
This is all from the web page: http://www.tigraionline.com/articles/article10002.html
No comments:
Post a Comment